birdsbirdsbirds: (♠ your arguement is now invalid)
яσвιи яє∂вяєαѕт ([personal profile] birdsbirdsbirds) wrote in [community profile] accordancy 2012-07-16 06:53 am (UTC)

Well, no. Okay. Here, see--

[he will start to explain--in full seriousness--while gesturing to the appropriate necklaces.]

They're both nice. Very fancy. This one, with the flowers, though... I don't know, it just seems uneven. I'd like it better without the flowers. Seems like some kinda nancy-prancy shit. Like, you wear that when you're frolicking through a meadow. That's some forest-mage stuff.

It's--it's girly, you know? And you don't really seem like the frolicking, cute, girly-flowers kind of guy, right? We're going for something manlier. Or, at least, gender neutral, right? Right.

So then you got this one, which looks cool. Gothic. It looks actually pretty fantastic, I guess, except... There's a face on it.

I mean, a fucking face. Just staring. Like some kind of... weird... baby... doll face. That's gonna be on the front of your chest. It's got a crown, too. Right. Or a hat. So what does that even mean? Who the hell is this guy? Or chick? Or whatever?

It's a toss-up. [he shakes his head.] It's really a fucking toss-up. But I guess, looking at this from the perspective of... I don't know, some poor, unsuspecting bystander... The flowery one is gonna look weird on a guy. I don't think you've got the ruffly shirts to pull that off. I don't think you'd want to wear the ruffly shirts to pull that off.

But that guy... You know, it's classy. It's gender neutral. Actually has a sort of sophistication to it that could work well over... I high collar, or something. So, okay. Yeah.

That one. [he points to the silver one.] That's my input.

Post a comment in response:

This community only allows commenting by members. You may comment here if you're a member of accordancy.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting